Hello folks,

Erik Nordmark wrote:

> > My point was that even though firewall would not know, if we have
> > enforcement of the "host-check" rule [cf. Pekka's mail for its decoding],
> > in all nodes _receiving_ the routing header, this would be a distributed way
> > of enforcing the conditions we discuss.
>
> Yes, if you make all hosts and routers inside the firewall have that check
> you'd be fine.

The same care is going to be required for routing headers as would be
for more general encapsulation in this regard.

For routing headers, all that is required is to check that the home address
is the next intermediate routing point after the care-of address.  If these
addresses were inserted into a longer sequence of intermediate routing
points, the same check would be sufficient _for the purposes of Mobile IPv6_!
The other parts of the routing path in the routing header would have to be
checked according to the rules of whatever policy was used to build up
the other parts of the routing path.

The exact same careful checking would be required if encapsulation
were used instead.

In this way, no crippling of the utility of the routing header would result.
On the other hand, I hope that my point can be understood that all such
uses will require care to avoid unwanted vulnerabilities.  Just like with
encapsulation!

> Two issues:
> 1. the firewall might not want to trust all the internal hosts and routers
>    to be correctly configured with such a rule.
> 2. I think this would prevent using routing headers for their general use
>    for traffic that is local to the domain inside the firewall.

I think it's crucial that hosts using routing headers for care-of address
redirection are themselves responsible for doing the check, and not
to rely on the firewall.  It's not the job of the firewall.  And if encapsulation
were in use, it would definitely not be the job of the firewall.  I don't see
why this is considered to be a relevant issue.

Regards,
Charlie P.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to