> From: Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > => if there is a TLL and TLL is forbiden or if there is no TLL and > TLL is mandatory then the NA is not valid and the R bit must not be > processed. Else the NA is valid and the R bit must be processed. I > believe your problem is more with validity checking than with the R > bit.
Ok, but here is the problem: where in RFC-2461 this is stated? My whole problem starts with this, there is no clear wording about this. (Nor there is any mention about mandatory vs. non-mandatory TLL). There is specific section "7.1.2 Validation of Neighbor Advertisements", and this specifies "valid advertisement". There no word about NA being invalid depending on presence of TLL or not. OK, this is all nitpicking, RFC needs just minor addition into 7.1.2: - if link uses addresses, then NA MUST have TLL. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
