In your previous mail you wrote:
Ok, but here is the problem: where in RFC-2461 this is stated?
=> section 4.4 page 24.
Nor there is any mention about mandatory vs. non-mandatory TLL
=> idem
There no word about NA being invalid depending on presence of TLL or not.
=> idem
OK, this is all nitpicking, RFC needs just minor addition into
7.1.2:
- if link uses addresses, then NA MUST have TLL.
=> NO, the MUST is in section 4.4 page 24. There is an explanation too...
The only not written detail is that a NA which doesn't comply with a MUST
is not valid, i.e. 7.1.2 is too brief.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: I've checked, the correct adjective for a semantic thing is semantic
(not semantical).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
