On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Francis Dupont wrote: > > => be serious, autotunnels are phased out, configured tunnels and 6to4 > > are mutually exclusive... > > mutually exclusive? I don't think so. > > => if you have a configured tunnel you can use native addresses so > you don't need a 6to4 router. They are mutually exclusive in practice
site-locals (or even 6to4 /64's, for site-internal tunneling) could used for configured tunneling in the presence of 6to4 :-). Relays are a difficult issue which IMO much less understandable. The issue is more about mutual exclusivity of autotunnel and 6to4, on which I don't agree with your view.. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
