Scott Bradner wrote: > > Perry sez: > > My personal taste is that we rename the field "Reserved -- must be > > zero" so that people quit coming up with proposals just because, as > > one person at Salt Lake City put it, "it is embarrassing that we have a > > flow label field but nothing uses it so we should come up with a use" > > I agree with this
I don't recall anyone saying that. I believe I said something along the lines of "we should either define the use, or define the field as reserved MBZ" because anything else just confuses everybody. I will come back to why I think MBZ is the wrong answer. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
