Sometimes, not always. See RFC 2983. Brian
"Perry E. Metzger" wrote: > > "James Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The most compelling application I've seen is > > for QoS classification when the packet > > is encrypted. Most of the other applications > > people have cited can probably be handled > > by other means, as you point out. > > Can't we do classification by expressing the traffic type in the > "traffic" field in the encapsulating packet, however? > > .pm > -- > Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > NetBSD Development, Support & CDs. http://www.wasabisystems.com/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
