Subrata Goswami wrote:
> 
> Both of the following example actually only tells you
> how to set them, not how to use them and both are
> optional.

No, they tell you how to use them. A flow_spec is how intserv
identifies flows; a classifier is how diffserv classifies
packets. Yes they are both optional - like many enhancements.

> 
> Given the fact that there are only 20 bits in the flow
> label, then globally only 4K flows can be defined - is that
> enough ?

It's the 2uple {source address, flow label} or possibly the
3uple {source addr, destination addr, flow label} that has to be
unique.

   Brian

> 
> Subrata
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:07 AM
> To: Perry E. Metzger
> Cc: Michael Thomas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Flow Label
> 
> "Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
> ...
> > Repeating my earlier request:
> >
> >         I'm an old fashioned kind of engineer. I'd like to see some folks
> from
> >         router vendors give us precise information about the *exact* use
> >         they'll put the flow label information to,
> 
> Here are the precise definitions the IETF has documented:
> 
> 1) IPv6 Flow-label FILTER_SPEC object: Class = 10, C-Type = 3
> 
> [RFC 2205, page 87]
> 
> 2) diffServMultiFieldClfrFlowId OBJECT-TYPE
>     SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (0..1048575)
>     MAX-ACCESS     read-create
>     STATUS         current
>     DESCRIPTION
>        "The flow identifier in an IPv6 header."
>     ::= { diffServMultiFieldClfrEntry 8 }
> 
> [draft-ietf-diffserv-mib-16.txt, approved as PS, page 52]
> 
> but these will be largely ignored by implementors until RFC 2460
> is cleaned up.
> 
> >         and quantitative
> >         information about how much better it will be for them to have the
> flow
> >         label than not to have it.
> 
> Nobody is going to publish that sort of competitive data. As noted earlier,
> this is quite likely to be either qualitative (ability to classify ESP
> traffic) or simply a matter of heat dissipation and the marginal cost of
> a chip set.
> 
>     Brian
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 
On assignment at the IBM Zurich Laboratory, Switzerland
Board Chairman, Internet Society http://www.isoc.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to