Charles E. Perkins writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm pretty far behind on reading these voluminous e-mails, but
> I would at least like to express again my belief that we could
> go forward with the HAO as it is. If the downside is that then
> there is vulnerability to (single!) packets being reflected back
> to an unsuspecting home address, then: []
That is not the only downside. The primary downsides
have been discussed here ad nauseum.
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
