May be I have missed something, but does the proposal allow a DSTM node to
propose an IPV4 and an IPV6 @ for the "Connection data" address? Another
way of expressing my question, does the proposal cope with a host offering
to its peer to dialog either in IPV4 or in IPV6 for the exchange of the
media content?
Thanks in advance for the clarification
Best regards
Laurent T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V Laurent Thiebaut tel: +33 (0)1 3077 0645
A L C A T E L e.mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 25/01/2002 23:16:05
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED](bcc:
Laurent THIEBAUT/FR/ALCATEL)
Subject: Last Call: Support for IPv6 in SDP to Proposed
Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Multiparty Multimedia Session
Control Working Group to consider Support for IPv6 in SDP
<draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-ipv6-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists by February 8, 2002.
Files can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-ipv6-01.txt
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
