On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hesham Soliman (ERA) wrote:
>   > 3) IMO, it's a bit questionable to use IPv4-mapped 
>   > addresses like this
>   > anyway. IPv4-mapped addresses should only be used (apart 
>   > from e.g. SIIT
>   > definition) as a node's internal representation for IPv4 
>   > address; for
>   > better compatibility, the node should use:
>   > 
>   >    u=http://10.2.12.126/marsII
>   > 
> 
> => But this does not look like an IPv6 address
> for an IPv6-only node. The SIIT case you 
> mentioned above is an example where this 
> would not work. 

See below.

>   > (this way the receiving IPv6 node can decide the mechanism 
>   > to reach the 
>   > IPv4-address; that is, if u= can contain either IPv4 or 
>   > IPv6 address)

I'll restate this: this depends on the definition of u=.

If 'u' can have:
 1) only IPv6 addresses, using mapped address is fine
 2) either iPv6 or IPv4 address, IMO IPv4 should be used when _sending_ 
the packet

We're arguing about point 2).  My point is that if address can be either,
some nodes [a dual stack] can receive values with u=[ipv4] _anyway_, and
must be able to cope with them.

> => The 'network' must give an indication 
> of the mechanism to be used. If you use 
> NAT-PT then you'll always see IPv6
> addresses, if you use SIIT then you will
> see the mapped addresses, which will dictate
> certain actions by the IPv6-only device. 
[snip rest]

Yeah, but the draft isn't about what the packet will look like after it
has been mangled by NAT-PT or SIIT -- what should be best when sent by
some node.  It's clear that if an IPv6-only node sees a packet, u= must be
an IPv6 address of _some_ form (if it's supposed to be reachable).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to