> There is nothing that forbids subneting into the IID (although it would > be difficult to subnet smaller than /80), but don't you think that, in the > time being, it would be wise to stick to /64 unless we have a hell of a > good reason?
I think it would be much wiser to NOT impose constraints on how people orgainze their networks until we have a hell of a good reason. e.g. If an ISP gives its customers /64s they should still be able to subnet. subnetting a /64 is a lot beter than NAT. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
