In your letter dated Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:55:16 +0100 you wrote:
>--On Thursday, January 31, 2002 03:09:08 PM +0700 Robert Elz
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I probably wouldn't either, though we don't want to totally forget
>> allocation efficiency - the way we make sure that IPv6 never runs
>> out is to always make sure we justify every allocation (which
>> doesn't mean organisations need to justify their need for a /48 -
>
>> but I'd certainly be making any organisation asking for a 2nd one
>> (in the same aggregatable block,
>
>If this will happen, which organisation would this be? Compared with
>current IPv4 /48 with the 16 bits for SLA is similar to a IPv4 Class
>A network.
What happens if an organization has a modem bank for dail-in? Do you hand
out /64s or something larger? Suppose that you want to give each 'modem user'
a fixed prefix, how soon do you run out of prefixes?
Philip Homburg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
