Vijay Devarapalli wrote: > two comments. > > These are individual proposals in the Mobile IP WG. and these > people are being "encouraged" to take them up in the IPv6 WG > rather than the Mobile IP WG.
I understand the role of cross WG sanity checking, but usually that is only done when the origin WG believes in the work but want verification, or that the work really belongs in the other group. > > and Fast Handoffs for Mobile IPv6 does not say "dont do DAD". > The document referenced specifically tries to justify avoiding DAD because it takes too long for fast handoffs. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
