>>>>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:15:41 -0500,
>>>>> Vladislav Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >> - 11.2: I share Vladislav's concerns (the MTU stuff is a bit too complex)
>>
>> > Do you mean the send() message should return an (immediate) error when
>> > the packet is not fit in the outgoing link MTU? But, as Erik
>> > explained in his reply to Vlad, we cannot always expect the immediate
>> > error. I admit the spec is a bit complex, but the spec should be
>> > generic enough (i.e. we cannot assume a particular type of OSes.)
>>
>> > => I've read Erik's answer but just try to explain the MTU stuff to
>> > a common programmer...
>>
>> So, what do you want in this section? Are you requiring a change
>> here? If so, please be more specific.
> Would you agree on adding the text similar to Section 6.6 about an additional
> error message on sendmsg(). The precendence is already set by Section 6.6,
> but I don't have a very strong opinion on this.
Okay, I'll add EMSGSIZE as an additional error to Section 11.2.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
