Hi Mike, > I think the v6 host requirements struck the right > balance: require the IP packet layer transforms, > and be silent on key distribution. Key > distribution is clearly a huge problem, but IPsec > doesn't mandate a single solution so I don't see > why the cellular requirements draft should either. > You can run IPsec with manually configured keys, > after all, so at a base level you can get > interoperability. This is foward progress IMO, > even though we clearly need more going forward.
Thanks for the clarification. I can see your point. The authors definately need to review how we address this in the document. thanks, John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
