John,

If this is a "use" draft you can't say must anything without "use" in the sentence.

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Should IP Security be Optional?
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > I do agree that the ESP and AH are really
> > simple and easy compared to the rest. Unfortunately,
> > this isn't going to be quite as easy as that. 
> > 
> > As we point out in section 3.8 the current
> > cellular networks sometimes have dynamic IP
> > address changes, and therefore manually keyed IPsec
> > isn't going to work as such and key management is
> > needed. While there might be multiple options
> > here, interoperability is a concern and hence
> > I feel that we must have a mandated key management
> > scheme. In the cellular host requirements draft, we
> > have chosen to say that IKE is a MUST in those
> > cases where we mandate IPsec. Do you disagree?
> > 
> > (In a way you could say that the cellular draft goes
> > *beyond* what the current IETF MUSTs are, given
> > that we mandate a full security solution in all cases,
> > though at the same time we don't mandate the current
> > requirement of AH and ESP in all cases.)
> > 
> > Anyway, this is just *our* proposal on what we think
> > would make sense. But the document is controlled by the
> > WG; please state your proposed security MUSTs for
> > IPv6 hosts, cellular or otherwise. Mike, what would you
> > like to have there, for instance?
> 
> Just to add onto Jari - it would be a no-brainer to
> state that IPsec (AH & ESP) MUST be supported,
> IKE MAY/SHOULD be supported.  However, does this 
> give users anything? Will it increase security for
> these devices, or is it just something that will make
> folks happy?  The authors prefer to have a reasonable
> discussion on security within the draft.  Knowledge of
> the field of Internet Security has increased since
> some of the initial IPv6 documents were published ...
> 
> thanks,
> John
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to