Hi Charlie I finally read the thread. > > I agree that it would be good to see some guidelines in an > > informational doc. However I disagree on the title change to > > IPv6 over cellular/3g. That is a different spec which we should > > also work on. > > It is possible to design "cellular" systems where the > 3GPP/PDP address assignment is completely replaced by > localized, stateless methods. The way that addresses > are assigned is not related to bandwidth, nor even to > essential authorization issues. It's an artifact of > near-compatibility with existing 2.5G layouts. GGSN > does not NECESSARILY need to control this process. > => That's fine, but we have to deal with what *is* right now and not what *may come*. There are people that want to roll out systems with IPv6 support today, R&D will no doubt improve things, but in this draft we need to deal with the current specs.
Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
