"Hesham Soliman (ERA)" wrote: > => That's fine, but we have to deal with what *is* > right now and not what *may come*. > There are people that want to roll out systems with > IPv6 support today, R&D will no doubt improve > things, but in this draft we need to deal with > the current specs.
That's exactly right, and I am suggesting that the draft be renamed to be "IPv6-support-for-what-exists-today". Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
