In your previous mail you wrote: But I don't really care about your opinion or others on what should be used or not used from the work we do in the IETF.
=> I disagree: the resources of IETF are not infinite so waste is a common concern. What I care about is if you find a technical hole or error in our protocol specifications or interoperablity issues. => I'd like to see any of the security concerns of draft-prigent-dhcpv6-threats-00.txt addressed, or a proof that "the capability of automatic allocation of reusable network addresses" has a meaning for IPv6 addresses (note that we have 5 years of proof of the opposite). Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
