At 05:52 PM 3/7/2002 +0100, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > It will be used for other configuration > parameters, as described in > draft-droms-dnsconfig-dhcpv6-01.txt Arguments > that DHCPv6 has no utility because of stateless address autoconfiguration > are bogus. > >=> the issue of DNS configuration is solved by another protocol. >You can disagree with the DT conclusions (or the principle of DTs) >but they propose a dedicated simpler protocol. DHCPv6 has to drag >the dynamic address allocation ball & chain and shall ever be far >more complex than any other solution for "additional configuration".
I do disagree with the DT conclusion - as do other WG member who spoke up in SLC - but I'll let the rest of the WG members make up their own minds about the various protocol proposals. If the other solutions are so simple, why aren't they done yet? - Ralph -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
