> From: Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> A while back I sent an email to the list talking about
> Reserving bits in RFC 2473 Interface IDs.

rfc-2373 I presume...

My opinion on this is: these ID related issues all belong to
IP-over-foo documents. The rfc-2373 should only talk about (prefix=n,
interface ID = 128-n), and not care at all what the ID bits are.

Thus, all references to EUI-64 should be removed from 2373.

I feel it would be cleaner specification that way, but if people want
to keep EUI-64 and other bits, I'm not going to nag you too much. Just
giving this "opinion" for the record.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to