Hi,

Would it make sense to consider whether separating "stateless DHCPv6" and
the stateful part (~address assignment) to separate drafts would make
sense?

I think a lot more people would be confortable with DHCPv6 if it was very
simple and supported only the informational records most people would only
use.. and stateful address and such specified in a separate draft?

Just a thought...

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to