>>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:19:40 -0800,
>>>>> "Richard Draves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sorry I wasn't reading correctly - obviously you were discussing the
> unspecified address not the loopback address!!
Okay.
> It's not clear to me that the unspecified address has a well-defined
> scope level...
Perhaps we have two choices:
1. treat :: as global
2. does (explicitly) not define the scope type (level) of ::
Even the choice 2 will make the document clear, and it will not cause
a problem in a practical point of view.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
