> > => For all those opposing the addition of the bit > > in the IID, I really hope you would carefully consider > > Jari's text above. For mechanisms designed to prove > > address ownership (relevant to securing ND, MIPv6 BUs > > and I can think of more), you MUST include the > > distinction in the _IP_address. The IP address _is_ > > the identifier relevant for this case, not the host > > name, URL or anything else. > > Two destination addresses, one that requires verification > by stronger > means, one which does not.
=> ?? Which part of my message are you answering ? Hesham > > -- > Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, > Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" > Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
