Pekka,
How do you identify those two addresses without reserving the bits ?
-mohan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:40 AM
> To: Hesham Soliman (ERA)
> Cc: Jari Arkko; Mohan Parthasarathy; Pekka Nikander;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Erik Nordmark
> Subject: RE: Allocating a bit in the RFC2374 Interface Identifier
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Hesham Soliman (ERA) wrote:
> > > > => For all those opposing the addition of the bit
> > > > in the IID, I really hope you would carefully consider
> > > > Jari's text above. For mechanisms designed to prove
> > > > address ownership (relevant to securing ND, MIPv6 BUs
> > > > and I can think of more), you MUST include the
> > > > distinction in the _IP_address. The IP address _is_
> > > > the identifier relevant for this case, not the host
> > > > name, URL or anything else.
> > >
> > > Two destination addresses, one that requires verification
> > > by stronger
> > > means, one which does not.
> >
> > => ?? Which part of my message are you answering ?
>
> I was just pointing out a possible alternative to reserving
> bits in the source addresses.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
>
>
