Keith, At 04:35 PM 4/23/2002 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > 3. If interpreted as absolute, binary requirements, 7 and 8 are > > quite likely fantasies. I intend 7 and 8 to be goals that proposed > > solutions can be measured against. > >I guess I don't see this as a very useful yardstick because >'no additional protocol definition' is too vague. Yeah ... after rereading my original draft list of requirements, it seems to me that the goals of requirements 7 and 8 are, in fact, the same as requirement 9 (see below). We don't care about new protocol design and implementation, per se, what we're really interested in is minimal time to deployment. If that seems correct, I'll delete 7 and 8 from my draft list... (from original list of requirements) > > 7. Definition of DNS configuration requires no additional > > protocol definition > > 8. Implementation of DNS configuration requires no additional protocol > > implementation > > 9. Time to initial deployment is minimal - Ralph -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
