[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is it reasonable for us to assume that, for most links, the number >> of advertised prefixes will never exceed 10? 7? > > we never know what the future operators will do, so it is safer > not to make assumptions. In that case, I think we have to do something to avoid doing DAD for all those prefixes. One solution would be to just do it for link-local prefixes, which according to Dave Thaler's argument then become subnet-local prefixes. Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
