James Kempf wrote: > Pekka, > > We will shortly be releasing the ABK draft with a statement like the > Photuris statement, which was included in IKE.
Sounds interesting! > Also, some people believe that IPsec will work. If some way can be found > around the keying problem, it could be a viable alternative. There may be ways around some of the problems, in the way that my previous e-mail outlined. However, generally speaking you will end up with a solution that separates good guys from the bad guys. But it isn't necessarily going to be able to indicate which ones of the "good guys" can use which IP addresses. This may or may not be sufficient, depending on who you ask. Jari P.S. There's also a separate e-mail list set up for the discussions. Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text "subscribe" in the body to join. The name of the list is "SEND" for Secure Neighbour Discovery. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
