None that I know of. I didn't mean to suggest that this should be a
chartered item, that is for the BOF to decide. Any solution to IPsec key
distribution that does not involve IKE (due to chicken and egg problem)
or manual keying (due to inconvenience for large scale public access
networks) should be on the table at this point, in addition to other
techniques, such as CGAs.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jari Arkko"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pekka Savola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: Securing Neighbor Discovery BOF
> James Kempf writes:
> > So is it the case then that there would be no change in IPsec
policy
> > required for doing AAA-based or roaming consortia-based key
management?
> > Is so, then perhaps this problem is fairly straightforward to
solve.
>
> Which working group has this in their charter?
>
> Mike
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
