> As for the impacts on the applications' behavior, I don't worry so > much. I've configured my laptop to prefer temporary addresses over a > year (for experiences - I'm not a privacy-conscious guy), and I've > never seen a trouble with the environment. I admit I'm only using a > limited type of applications (and we cannot be sure about future > applications), but I believe it covers a certain amount of today's > major applications, including pop client, smtp client, www client, ftp > client, ssh client, and DNS resolver. In particular, I don't worry > about the "relatively short lifetime" through the experience.
I don't think it's reasonable to allow "today's major applications" to constrain the behavior of all present and future applications. I work with p2p and distributed systems every day, and trying to deal with temporary and scoped addresses really is very difficult for them. If we are not careful we will end up imposing NAT-like restrictions in IPv6 even if IPv6 does not have NATs. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
