> as far as I remember from the past presentations, Hardie draft did > propose interdomain anycast scheme. the diagram in appendix A look > like intradomain, however, section 1.4 and 1.5 does not have any > restriction on intra/interdomain. the diagram I saw at dnsop meeting > was interdomain (single prefix advertised with a single AS #, from > multiple different location).
The latter sounds like the Ohta draft. > >> distribution of servers is worldwide. BGP anycast is being used for > >> specific upper-layer protocols only, like DNS and HTTP. There is no > >Where is it being used for HTTP? The documents you cite talk about DNS > >and UDP exclusively. > > webserver for past olympic games. i don't have any citable document > on it. Was this usage interdomain or not? Perhaps there is some IBM reference (even if it is not stable) that can be added. Independent of that some more explanation of how it's been used with http would be helpful. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
