>> as far as I remember from the past presentations, Hardie draft did
>> propose interdomain anycast scheme. the diagram in appendix A look
>> like intradomain, however, section 1.4 and 1.5 does not have any
>> restriction on intra/interdomain. the diagram I saw at dnsop meeting
>> was interdomain (single prefix advertised with a single AS #, from
>> multiple different location).
>
>The latter sounds like the Ohta draft.
it seemed to me Ohta draft and Hardie draft were exactly the same,
modulo the usage policy of AS #s. also for me Hardie draft (now RFC)
does not seem to put any restriction to be intradomain. it just
doesn't say anything about intra/interdomain.
>> webserver for past olympic games. i don't have any citable document
>> on it.
>Was this usage interdomain or not?
>Perhaps there is some IBM reference (even if it is not stable) that can be
>added. Independent of that some more explanation of how it's been used
>with http would be helpful.
interdomain. single prefix advertised with a single AS #, from
multiple different location (route injected into multiple different
ISPs).
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
