>> Michel Py wrote: >> It is a terrible responsibility to embed everyone-gets-one >> PI-address in the addressing architecture.
> Keith Moore wrote: > why do you think it's not an equally terrible responsible > to say "nobody gets a global address prefix unless it's > tied to a provider"? I don't. What part of my postings makes you think so? Tony and I are proposing schemes that are aggregatable and that are not tied to a provider. > what makes you think that the policy groups are better > qualified than we are to make such a decision? we have enough > trouble understanding the various technical implications (at > all protocol layers and above) of such a decision - the policy > groups are even less knowledgable. The policy groups have to deal with user pressure. Instead of questioning their competence, I prefer the path of providing them with a solution that gives them other options than desperate measures. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
