Keith, >> There is one thing that worries me about such a scheme: it does in fact >> give a PI address to everybody. It is to be feared that people using >> these addresses will make arrangements with their upstreams to have >> these leaked in the global table.
> Keith Moore wrote > and everybody else will filter them, and refuse to forward > such advertisements, as they should. This is what I would _hope_, but we just don't know. If there is demand and money for it, it will happen whether you and I like it or not. Please allow me to rephrase my point: Site-ids for SL addresses do fulfill a need that I acknowledge (I mostly share kre's views on renumbering). However, I do think that we should not get started on this slippery slope _before_ we provide another solution to people that would push pervert them into unaggregated PI. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
