In your previous mail you wrote: The Default Address Selection draft is currently with IESG, waiting for approval for PS. There was clear consensus in the WG to send this document to the IESG, we held a WG last call, and it has since been updated based on IESG feedback. I have followed this discussion, and it is clear that one or two people object to the changes made based on IESG review. However, I don't see any WG consensus that there are problems with this document that should block its publication as a PS. Thoughts? => I repeat my strong objection: this document should not be on the standard track. I already explained why and the fact it was some years and versions ago should be a good proof I was right... I have some precise concerns about the last draft I'll develop in another message ASAP.
Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
