On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 08:51 AM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
>
>> => again this is inadequate and stresses the previous issue.
>> This MUST must not move to the standard track part.
>> Note my environment suggestion works well for this case because
>> daemons (which want the public address) run with another userID
>> than applications of physical users (which want a temporary address).
>> We really need soemthing tunable from the outside, not a new switch
>> in every applications...
>
> I tend to agree. I previously said a per-node switch is better for
> privacy purposes (though some disagreed), but more accurately, a
> per-user switch is better.
The same user may want to use privacy when browsing
the wild wild web and application robustness when
accessing data on a file server.
I like Francis suggestion of an environment switch.
- Alain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------