>We certainly shouldn't *require* apps to make a decision, but (see my
>previous message) we must make it possible for them. Therefore,
>the API must provide an option for the sender to set the value.
the problem is, we need to provide a way for apps to pick a non-
conflicting value to do that, and it gets very messy. that is the
reason why my draft does not provide ways for apps to pick the value.
>In any case,
>draft-itojun-ipv6-flowlabel-api-01.txt will have to be reviewed after we
>reach consensus on draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label
yes, that is why it is expired state.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
