with regards to the PD discussion after Miyakawa-san's presentation.
I've added some requirements, and based on that started with a
comparison. I haven't read the router renumbering spec lately, so
please fill me in on that one.
Mechanisms
----------
Router Renumbering RFC2894
ICMP PD draft-haberman-ipngwg-auto-prefix-02.txt
DHCP PD draft-troan-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-01.txt
PPP/IPV6CP option -
Proxy-RA/Multi-link subnet draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00.txt
RA option draft-lutchann-ipv6-delegate-option-00.txt
Requirements:
draft-miyakawa-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-00.txt
-------------
A. L2 independent
B. Multi-access/Point to point
C. Support for Renumbering
D. Any prefix length can be delegated
E. Authentication
F. Negotiation, i.e requestor has a say
G. Other configuration options, e.g DNS, NTP with the same mechanism
H. Accounting (I did not understand this requirement)
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
-----------------------------------------------------
Router Renumbering| x | both| x | x | ? | - | - | |
ICMP PD | x | both| x | x | ? | x | * | |
DHCP PD | x | both| x | x | x | x | x | |
PPP/IPV6CP option | - | p2p | - | x | x | ? | * | |
Proxy-RA | x | p2p | x | - | - | - | * | |
new RA option | x | p2p | x | x | - | - | * | |
-----------------------------------------------------
x - supported
- - not supported
* - could be supported, but perhaps not a good fit i.e DNS options in IPV6CP
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
