Ole Troan wrote:

> with regards to the PD discussion after Miyakawa-san's presentation.
> I've added some requirements, and based on that started with a
> comparison. I haven't read the router renumbering spec lately, so
> please fill me in on that one.
>
> Mechanisms
> ----------
> Router Renumbering          RFC2894
> ICMP PD                     draft-haberman-ipngwg-auto-prefix-02.txt
> DHCP PD                     draft-troan-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-01.txt
> PPP/IPV6CP option           -
> Proxy-RA/Multi-link subnet  draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00.txt
> RA option                   draft-lutchann-ipv6-delegate-option-00.txt
>
> Requirements:
>  draft-miyakawa-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-00.txt
> -------------
> A. L2 independent
> B. Multi-access/Point to point

I'm glad to see interest in generalizing beyond just the point-to-point case.
I'd like to have a solution that allows the requesting router to be more
than one hop away from the prefix delegator.  This would be useful for
deploying large scale networks.  This isn't a requirement for the isp-home
scenario that needs a solution in the short term, but if the solution chosen
for that is useful for the large network deployment scenario, so much
the better.

>
> C. Support for Renumbering
> D. Any prefix length can be delegated
> E. Authentication
> F. Negotiation, i.e requestor has a say
> G. Other configuration options, e.g DNS, NTP with the same mechanism
> H. Accounting (I did not understand this requirement)
>
>                   | A |  B  | C | D | E | F | G | H |
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Router Renumbering| x | both| x | x | ? | - | - |   |
> ICMP PD           | x | both| x | x | ? | x | * |   |
> DHCP PD           | x | both| x | x | x | x | x |   |
> PPP/IPV6CP option | - | p2p | - | x | x | ? | * |   |
> Proxy-RA          | x | p2p | x | - | - | - | * |   |
> new RA option     | x | p2p | x | x | - | - | * |   |
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> x - supported
> - - not supported
> * - could be supported, but perhaps not a good fit i.e DNS options in IPV6CP
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to