Let me add one thing. From: Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * IPv6 WG has in the past accepted the HAO as a mandatory > feature for all IPv6 nodes. Arguments have been made, > however, that the processing of the HAO has been changed > and the situation may now be different. In addition, the current draft requires not only HAO but also BE. This means all IPv6 nodes must implement a new extention header (mobility header). I never say that such a mechanism is bad at all. It is good of course. But from the view of the fast deployment of both IPv6 and Mobile IPv6, I personally think it better not to require additional requirements... This is not the view of the protocol designer, though. I'm probablly a bad designer and a bad scientist. I just want a real IPv6 and a Mobile IPv6... Best Regards, --- Keiichi SHIMA IIJ Research Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KAME Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
