Keiichi SHIMA wrote: > Let me add one thing. > > From: Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>* IPv6 WG has in the past accepted the HAO as a mandatory >> feature for all IPv6 nodes. Arguments have been made, >> however, that the processing of the HAO has been changed >> and the situation may now be different. >> > > In addition, the current draft requires not only HAO but also BE. > This means all IPv6 nodes must implement a new extention header > (mobility header).
Correct. Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
