>>      read draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-anycast-analysis-01.txt for more on this
>>      topic.
>Please elaborate.  I don't think the draft discusses this at all.

        Randy is talking about changing definition of "anycast" in RFC2460
        to definition in draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-anycast-analysis-01.txt section
        2.2.  is it clear enough?

>With RFC2460 anycast, you can always assume there is another unicast 
>address of at least same scope assigned on the node.  As the node cannot 
>use RFC2460 address as a source address, it will use unicast address.  
>Problem solved(?).

        i don't quite parse it.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to