>>>> read draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-anycast-analysis-01.txt for more on this >>>> topic. >>> Please elaborate. I don't think the draft discusses this at all. >> Randy is talking about changing definition of "anycast" in RFC2460 >> to definition in draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-anycast-analysis-01.txt section >> 2.2. is it clear enough? > No, he isn't.
i think he is. but i could be wrong. after all, he has said it about 42 times not. > What he is saying is 'if you try to connect anycast address PRFX::/64, the > ICMP unreachable (or whatever) message comes back from PRFX::X/64 (unicast > address on the node)'. i don't think he was saying that. but again, i could be wrong. > See above. There should be no nodes which have only RFC2460 anycast > address(es), as they must not use it as a source address. brokenness randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
