----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Elz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | They probably need to be able to use tunneling, at least some of them. > > I agree. They're also one of the more likely users of unconfigured > tunnels (6to4) - they get one IPv4 addr, and offer IPv6 connectivity to > the end user, without requiring any other infrastructure to be operating. > > This sounds like a good way to encourage more users of IPv6, so we shouldn't > be doing anything to make it more difficult to achieve. >
IP"NG" and IPv6 are not the same thing.... ...as for encouraging usage of the Next Generation Internet, one way is to make sure that address space is readily available, fairly allocated, and low-cost or free. The I* society does not seem to approach things from that point of view. Therefore, people are routing around it. That is the Internet way... Jim Fleming 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think... http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
