On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Robert Elz wrote: > I disagree there. I also disagree that being able to reassemble one > packet at a time is enough, just a small amount of IPv4 packet reordering > would blow away an implementation tried to reply upon that.
If the alternative to reassebling one packet at a time is discarding all of those messages, perhaps some would consider it a reasonable tradeoff. I wouldn't want to rely on it either, but it (kind of) satisfies a requirement, even if not properly. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
