>  |    - pointing out that the current text does not give any guidance
>  |      to incoming TCP SYN case, and
>
>I am not disputing that come clarifications might be needed to the text,
>just
>
>  |    - we should drop incoming TCP SYN to deprecated addresses.
>
>isn't the clarification that should be made, it should be the
>exact opposite of that.  We should accept TCP SYN to deprecated
>addresses, for the reasons that Pekka just gave much more clearly than
>I have been able.

        even if you don't advertise your address to public via DNS,
        people will try to connect (people can portscan, ping6 ff02::1,
        whatever).  i don't agree with Pekka's take.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to