>How about changing:
> (e.g.,the opening of a new TCP connection)
>to
> (e.g., an active open of a new TCP connection)
>I'm assuming that "active open" vs. "passive open" terminology is
>well-understood (I think it's in RFC 1122).
it certainly make things better. i would like to see description
in page 3 much shortened to avoid (possible) inconsistencies.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
