this would all have to be done out of band just like tcp from addr conf like daemon that listens to the RAs and/or timers.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Sommerfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:09 PM > To: Peter Lei > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: need clarification of "deprecated" address [multihomed > case] > > > > However, should any new connections (SCTP associations) > FROM this host to > > a peer list the deprecated address as part of the > association? Given the > > existing text and this discussion, it seems that it should > not, as other > > preferred address(es) are available. Of course unless as > qualified by the > > proposed text below-- that it is the only address available > (eg. the host > > is single homed/has a single valid address which happens to > be a deprecated > > address). > > Does SCTP provide some way to describe a preferred order over the > addresses, or is the address set inherently unordered? Does it > provide a way to delete an address from an active connection? > > If there is an ordering, pushing deprecateds to the bottom of the > barrel (and deleting them when they expire) sounds most robust and in > keeping with the rest of the discussion on this thread. > > - Bill > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
