Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:58:33 +1000
From: Brett Pentland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| I don't understand how not doing DAD relates to DIID. I thought
| (possibly mistakenly) that the proposal that Steve Deering presented was
| to do with eliminating the delay introduced DAD for addresses that are
| unlikely to conflict with others, allowing faster aquisition of new
| addresses (helpful for mobile nodes).
Yes, it did all that. But it turns out that to make DIID really work,
it would be close to essential to do this. Just why is no longer really
relevant (Steve can explain if he feels inclined).
kre
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
