> From: Robert Elz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
[...]
> | I don't understand how not doing DAD relates to DIID.  I thought
> | (possibly mistakenly) that the proposal that Steve Deering presented
was
> | to do with eliminating the delay introduced DAD for addresses that
are
> | unlikely to conflict with others, allowing faster aquisition of new
> | addresses (helpful for mobile nodes).
>
> Yes, it did all that.   But it turns out that to make DIID really
work,
> it would be close to essential to do this.   Just why is no longer
really
> relevant (Steve can explain if he feels inclined).

I agree with Brett.  I still strongly support Steve's proposal
with DAD.  It reduces the startup delay in most scenarios.

-Dave

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to