> From: Robert Elz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [...] > | I don't understand how not doing DAD relates to DIID. I thought > | (possibly mistakenly) that the proposal that Steve Deering presented was > | to do with eliminating the delay introduced DAD for addresses that are > | unlikely to conflict with others, allowing faster aquisition of new > | addresses (helpful for mobile nodes). > > Yes, it did all that. But it turns out that to make DIID really work, > it would be close to essential to do this. Just why is no longer really > relevant (Steve can explain if he feels inclined).
I agree with Brett. I still strongly support Steve's proposal with DAD. It reduces the startup delay in most scenarios. -Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
